Thursday, October 9, 2008
Thinking about the consequences
I thought these were interesting:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2005/jun/03/politics.publicservices
http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=2753
Facts about healthcare
So many poeple to not have the service they need. Universal healthcare sytem will save so much money and save alot of lives.
Wednesday, October 8, 2008
An Inalienable Right
There are many issues that are constantly on the table when debating about should we or shouldn’t we have universal healthcare. It seems ridiculous to me that people would be opposed to it since having healthcare has never seemed like a bad thing to me. This is a topic I feel very strongly about, and although I am fully aware of the cons, the pros always outweigh each. My views were strengthened even more after reading Guinier’s, “The Tyranny of The Majority”.
I like Guinier’s turn taking philosophy. It allows the majority to rule some of the time and the minority to rule some of the time. In fact, I would even dare to take it a step further and want to appease both sides simultaneously. For the most part, private insurers and drug companies are a part of the bureaucracy, and the only word I can associate with bureaucracy fittingly is capitalist. To me, this means that most of these providers are only out for the buck. According to insurance.ca.gov, “Yes, Insurance companies usually look at your height and weight when they decide to offer insurance. They may offer you insurance at a higher premium rate or refuse to insure you if you are overweight or obese.” How can that possibly be a good thing?
There is only one logical answer. It is the implementation of a universal healthcare system. People often throw out there the cons of the universal healthcare in places like Europe and Canada, but why would we directly make the same mistakes they have made. Our goal should be to learn from their mistakes and try to be better. If what we have is obviously not the answer, than what could be so wrong with trying a new system that has and still is working in other parts of the world? A universal healthcare system would bridge that gap that divides the country with something that is supposed to be an “inalienable right”; the right to life, and not to mention the pursuit of happiness. Who has ever been happy being unhealthy?
“The Tyranny of the Majority” and thoughts
The taking turn’s method could work when it comes to healthcare. I think the majority should get what they want, which is a universal healthcare system. The minority should also have some say and get their “turn”. Maybe giving those who want private insurance more coverage is the way to go. Some may say this is just like how it was; some people get more than others. But while some may have more coverage, everyone will have the basic healthcare they deserve. No more people will get denied health insurance and go on living their life in fear of getting sick or hurt. Families can be ruined by one simple insurance bill. A compromise could and should be made during the switch to universal healthcare.
Socialized Medicine: A Good Plan?
Reading Guinier’s “The Tyranny of the Majority” made me realize how much the majority population can hold control over the minority. When the government decides to side with the majority and take control of the healthcare aspect of our lives, our country will slowly become a socialist one. We are now a democracy where our ideas and beliefs are being represented by elected individuals. When the majority wins and the minority’s voice is suppressed, we will become more of a socialist country where social and political aspects of our life are being controlled primarily by the government.
Even though I believe that everyone should have a basic healthcare insurance policy in case of emergency, I still believe that everyone should have a right to choose whether or not they want a private healthcare policy. This is very similar when choosing between a community college, state university, and a private university. A person should be able to choose which college he or she wants to go to without having to be pressured by the government. Many can argue that a lot of people cannot afford private universities, but there are many alternatives such as loans and federal grants that help students pay for college. Also in the medical world, there are many charities and foundations that help people pay off their medical bills.
When the government becomes somehow like a tyrant when it takes control of everything. Healthcare in England is being dominated by the government, and it has many downfalls. It also has many benefits, but they are stated without having people look at the negatives also. For example, a study funded by the department of health in England shows that one in five patients that undergo a heart bypass surgery operation do not receive the best healthcare quality possible. Also, many patients die without having been told by their doctors that they were at risk of losing their life, or because they have been on the waiting list for too long.
Another report published by the National Audit Office and Commission states that the NHS is in a huge amount of debt. This is due to the financial management of the NHS. A balance must be put in place in order to manage the NHS financially. The United States is already in a huge amount of debt due to things such as the Iraqi war. For example, the Congressional Budget Office projects that the United States is in a $1.4 trillion deficit from 2004 to 2013. We do not need to put ourselves in a greater amount of debt at the time being.
Socialized medicine is not the best way to tackle the health care problem we have in our country. We do not need our government to be more involved in our daily lives, and we should look at England as a model for this plan and see how it is not good for our country. The majority should not always dominate because many others will have their opinions suppressed, and that is not democratic at all.
I found this article very interesting:
http://www.liberty-page.com/issues/healthcare/ukheartdelay2.html
Tuesday, October 7, 2008
Something to look at
some of the things health insurance companies deny people healthcare or make them spend more money. These are just the main things.
Kennedys Inaugural Adress
In Kennedy’s Inaugural Address, he talks about working with other nations. Doing this can strengthen our government and make us stronger. He also talks about helping those in the huts and villages and the people who have no say in their government. America cannot become a better and strong government by itself. Intergrading other cultures and ideas will strengthen our government. We could also learn from other societies, and maybe adopt some of their beliefs. I believe the government should be based on the people’s feelings. Helping other nations is an example of that. We could help others and give them what they feel is right. Fairness and equality should be the main concern for every human being.
Having a Universal healthcare system will give the people their fairness. We can learn from other countries like Europe and Canada who have adopted this system. All people will be treated with the same treatment. This treatment will be available to the rich and the poor making a division in society obsolete. The government must do what is right for the people, not what will make more money. The healthcare system in America is making too much profit, which is why a change is hard for the government. So many people preach equality and fairness, but why do we still treat America’s health care system with inequality?